Design with Permaculture

Exploring Concepts and Themes for Sustainable System Design

• Games of Light • Season 1 • Episode 2

Share episode

In this episode, we explore how holistic design can align modern science with practical ethics to preserve and enrich living systems. We discuss the idea that nature functions as an open system—one in which cycles of growth, decay, and renewal can be harnessed multiple times before energy is lost. We also examine the “law of return,” the distinction between dogma and flexible principles, and how diverse yields can stabilize everything from a backyard garden to large-scale farms. By weaving in real-world examples and critiques, this episode offers a fresh perspective on building resilience and abundance.

Send us a text

Support the show

Affiliate Links:

Welcome. Today, we’re delving into the essential concepts that reveal how living systems sustain themselves and how we can design with those natural cycles in mind. We’ll explore the idea that nature responds powerfully to every action we take, and how traditional myths once warned us of these repercussions through stories of natural cataclysms. We’ll then look at ways to harness open-system energy flows—seeing how resources like water, sunlight, and soil fertility can be cycled repeatedly to create abundance rather than waste.

We’ll also discuss the “law of return,” a principle that challenges us to give back what we take and maintain balance. Alongside that, we’ll address why chasing a single, maximum yield (like a record-sized crop) can lead to ecological fragility, and how embracing diversity ensures greater stability. All of these themes tie into a broader vision of designing systems—gardens, farms, and even communities—that are resilient, ethically grounded, and aligned with nature’s own processes.

Context For A Design Science

Let’s open with the central premise: we lack a popular set of directives to replace old tribal guidelines. Many of those ancient taboos—handed down through myths—were essentially ecological checks on our behavior. For instance, an indigenous community might have stories discouraging the gratuitous killing of certain species, effectively preventing overhunting. Now, we live in societies that often disregard those ecological checks because, in many regions, they were discarded without being replaced by anything comparable in strength or reach. As a result, large-scale exploitation can occur without the moral guardrails that older cultures once provided.

The text references the Gaia hypothesis—that the Earth acts like a self-regulating entity. Any attempt to push natural systems out of balance triggers a reaction. While that might sound esoteric, numerous scientific findings now back up aspects of this hypothesis. If you dump massive amounts of pollutants into the oceans, for example, you might provoke algae blooms or widespread fish kills. If you raze old-growth forests, you can alter precipitation patterns and cause soil erosion that cycles right back to harm local agriculture. Essentially, every major action has consequences, whether immediate or slow-moving.

Absolutely. Traditional myths often used narrative devices like cataclysmic punishments—storms, floods, plagues—to warn people against overreaching. In modern parlance, we say that natural systems carry feedback loops. In many myths, a human or group violates a rule, and nature unleashes devastation in response. Psychologically and socially, that was a potent lesson: it kept behaviors in check. Once we drifted away from these narratives, we ended up substituting them with either no constraints or purely anthropocentric constraints—regulations that revolve around human interactions but fail to include broader ecological concerns. That’s one reason we see perverse outcomes such as entire rivers becoming biologically dead from industrial waste.

This first section underscores the need for a “design science revolution.” The text highlights a phrase from Buckminster Fuller, saying that we can harness “design science” to address pressing global problems and drastically enhance performance per unit of resource. That’s a clarion call to create well-thought-out, holistic systems rather than continuing with destructive or short-sighted methods. We can think of it as a shift from random or profit-driven exploitation to methodical, ethics-driven stewardship.

Rethinking Science And Ethical Frameworks

The text then moves into a discussion of how scientific method, especially in its most conventional forms, often deals poorly with living systems. The reason? Traditional experiments isolate variables in controlled conditions. That’s relatively straightforward with inanimate objects, but living ecosystems are dynamic, full of interdependencies, and rarely “stand still” for analysis. If you try to isolate or remove certain factors in a forest, for example, you’re likely to disrupt countless organisms in ways you didn’t anticipate. This leads to unpredictability, which can be disconcerting for classical, reductionist science.

There’s also a commentary on how purely mechanistic views of nature can lead to moral or ethical voids. Science without any ethical compass might produce breakthroughs but can also enable damaging actions—like creating potent pesticides that wipe out beneficial insects alongside pests, or enabling mass deforestation for temporary economic gain. The text suggests, by contrast, that we need a nuanced science that respects life’s complexity and integrates ethical guidelines.

Precisely. Many pivotal discoveries arise not from rigid protocols but from observing living systems in flux—recognizing patterns, anomalies, or “accidents” that reveal deeper truths. The text brings up this concept of the “thousand names of God,” implying that rigorous “naming” or enumerating every factor in a living system is impossible. Life’s complexity isn’t easily pinned down by definitions or laws. Each new observation can change the scenario dramatically.

Moreover, there’s a strong critique of the idea that science is “value-free.” When we apply science in real life—especially in agriculture, conservation, or community development—we inevitably inject our values, whether we acknowledge them or not. If we choose to test a new herbicide, that test can wipe out entire insect populations or degrade soil microbes. This might bring short-term weed control, but we risk long-term soil infertility. So the text basically challenges us to become ethically aware and realize that scientific or technological interventions aren’t neutral. They have wide ripple effects.

Principles Versus Dogma

Next, we see a discussion distinguishing guiding principles from inflexible rules or dogmas. The text criticizes rigid frameworks that often break down under real-world conditions. For example, if someone says, “All farms must have exactly X number of livestock per acre,” that might be a dogma. But conditions vary—soil fertility, climate, topography, cultural practices, all differ from one location to another. A better approach is principle-based: “Stock animals in proportion to the carrying capacity and resilience of your land, adjusting for changing conditions.” That principle is adaptable across diverse contexts and doesn’t fall apart when circumstances shift.

One standout principle here is the “Law of Return.” It states: “Whatever we take, we must return,” or in another formulation, “Nature demands a return for every gift received.” On a farm level, it might mean if you harvest crops, you must replenish the soil with organic matter, mulch, or compost. In a broader sense, if an industry cuts down trees to produce paper, it should plant enough new trees to compensate for that resource extraction. The text mentions how failing to do so results in natural penalties, often in the form of degraded land, pollution, or resource scarcity.

This is where the conversation about “paying rent” to nature emerges. The text suggests that every user or consumer of a resource—be it farmland, forests, or fossil fuels—must reinvest in the source. If you’re a consumer of books, support publishers that plant trees. If you run a manufacturing facility, invest in waste treatment and recycling. The point is that ignoring this “Law of Return” leads to the slow collapse of the very systems that sustain us.

We also get a notion of “policy of responsibility,” which basically says that any beneficial authority should aim to foster self-reliance rather than keep individuals or communities dependent. A truly wise leadership or design approach empowers each part of a system—whether it’s a person, a neighborhood, or an ecosystem—to regulate itself. Once everything self-regulates, you don’t need heavy-handed rules or external policing. That’s the essence of effective design.

Energy, Entropy, And Open Systems

One of the more technical discussions revolves around thermodynamics, especially concerning energy flow and entropy. Classical physics teaches that in a closed system, energy eventually dissipates into less usable forms. But the Earth, considered as part of a cosmic system, isn’t fully closed; we receive solar energy, among other inputs. Living things—forests, grasslands, coral reefs—turn solar energy into biomass, effectively storing it for a time. This is sometimes described as reversing entropy locally, even though the universe overall trends toward increasing entropy.

The text underscores how life is a set of “open systems.” Trees, animals, soil microbes—everything is engaged in a continual exchange of energy and matter. Because of this, if we design our gardens, farms, or settlements with these open-system dynamics in mind, we can intercept energy flows multiple times. Water can be caught at high elevations, used to irrigate a hillside orchard, then flow into a pond where it helps fish thrive, then pass through a series of channels to water livestock, eventually filtering back into the ground to recharge aquifers.

This is linked to the principle: “Work out how to best use energy before it exits your site.” If it’s wind, maybe you harness it for mechanical energy, then as it passes through a greenhouse for ventilation, and then as it flows into a windbreak that buffers your field from erosion. If it’s solar radiation, you capture it in greenhouse spaces, store heat in thermal mass, then let it radiate out slowly overnight. The text’s big message is to see these flows as opportunities to create yields—and yield isn’t strictly food. It can be warmth, scenic value, or the well-being of local wildlife.

But the text also points out that cities or industries often break the principle of “returning resources” by polluting. When sewage, runoff, or industrial chemicals are just funneled into waterways, the entire system suffers. The overall push is for cyclical use of resources rather than one-way use that ends in contamination. In a cyclical system, wastes become inputs, fueling another layer of productivity.

Defining Resources

In the next part, the text offers a taxonomy of resources. It stresses how certain resources actually increase with careful use. Think of grasses that respond well to moderate grazing—too little grazing and they grow woody or coarse, too much and they get depleted, but the right amount stimulates fresh growth. Similarly, the text cites information as a resource that can “grow” through sharing and application. That’s a compelling idea: knowledge expands when circulated, unlike a physical object that might wear out.

Other resources remain stable if used responsibly, or degrade if neglected (like unharvested fruit rotting on the branch). And there are those that diminish with every use—like fossil fuels. The text makes a strong moral argument that society should limit or ban resources that pollute or cause irreparable harm. Large highways, radioactive materials, or persistent pesticides fall into this worrisome category.

This classification helps us see that not all resources are created equal. Some can be part of regenerative cycles, some must be handled cautiously, and some should be phased out if we want a sustainable world. This is a shift from the typical approach that lumps all resources into the same basket as “things to exploit for profit.” Instead, it demands nuanced thinking: “Is this resource renewable if used wisely? Does it degrade unless we harvest it? Or does it vanish permanently once tapped?”

The text ties this to a concept of “enough,” urging us to avoid overshoot. Over-harvesting a renewable resource can degrade it to the point it’s no longer renewable. Or injecting too many chemical inputs can lead to toxic buildup. “Enough” is a subtle but key idea in design thinking—knowing how to balance immediate needs with long-term stability.

Yields In Design

The conversation then shifts into yields, a central theme in the text. It’s worth noting that yield isn’t just about harvesting crops or livestock. It’s about any surplus of energy, nutrients, or intangible benefits such as improved mental health. If a design is well thought out, it might provide a steady yield of food across seasons (by staggering plantings or selecting different varieties) rather than everything ripening at once. That helps avoid gluts and shortages.

We read about how to store these yields: physically, like canning produce, or ecologically, like letting tubers remain in the ground until needed. The text also covers intangible yields: knowledge, cultural stability, or a sense of belonging. When a system fosters local traditions around food, for example, it yields cultural resilience. That nuance is crucial. Many mainstream systems measure success purely in economic terms—how many dollars a field produces—but ignore intangible benefits or costs.

Yes, there’s an important critique here: chasing a maximum single yield—like a record-breaking pumpkin—often leads to fragile systems. Overly specialized breeds of cattle, poultry, or plants can become disease-prone or require heavy inputs of fertilizers and antibiotics. These are vulnerabilities. The text warns that “feast or famine” cycles can result from such extremism. A more sensible route is stable, diverse yields that collectively sustain a region through different seasons and market conditions. In that sense, yield is about resilience and consistency, not about chasing the biggest or the most in a narrow sense.

This section also critiques standard agricultural show competitions where the largest produce or highest milk yield is prized regardless of how many resources were poured into achieving it. That approach can obscure the real cost to soil fertility, animal welfare, or local ecosystems. By contrast, if we measure overall net gain in terms of system stability—soil still fertile, water table maintained, multiple species thriving—we might decide that a “slightly smaller pumpkin” grown with no chemical inputs and in harmony with local biodiversity is actually a more remarkable achievement.

Cycles As Time-Based Opportunities

Next, the text dives deeper into cycles—day/night, seasonal changes, and other recurring phenomena. The big argument is that every cycle represents a chance to capture or redirect energy before it dissipates. The passage on geese, for instance, describes how geese might eat grass, deposit nutrients through their manure, lose feathers that decompose to feed soil microbes, and so on. Each loop in the chain can lead to multiple yields.

A major point is that we, as designers, should identify these cycles, facilitate them, and possibly add more. We can “stack” or nest cycles so that waste from one process feeds another. For example, orchard prunings might go to a mushroom patch, spent mushroom substrate might become compost for vegetable beds, and vegetable scraps might feed poultry. Linking them all reduces waste and increases overall output. This is different from a linear chain where orchard trimmings go to a landfill. Instead, everything stays in continuous circulation.

By acknowledging cyclical processes, we also avoid the typical linear “take-make-dispose” approach. Modern societies often disregard cycles, shipping waste far away. The text suggests re-establishing local loops—like composting, greywater reuse, or reusing building materials—whenever possible. In designing a homestead, farm, or even an urban environment, you orchestrate these flows so that each resource is used multiple times.

Plus, cycles connect directly to the concept of time niches. Instead of planting everything at once, you can spread out sowing dates, or incorporate short-season vegetables between fruit trees. You adapt to the tempo of nature, rather than forcibly bending nature to an artificial schedule. The text implies that resilience emerges from respecting these cyclical rhythms and not overloading any one cycle.

Complexity, Connections, And Order Versus Chaos

In the following section, the text explores how complexity arises in living systems. Complexity doesn’t necessarily mean chaos; it can mean rich interconnections. Ecosystems that appear “messy” might be brimming with reciprocal relationships that keep them stable. For instance, a forest floor littered with fallen branches and leaf mulch can support various fungi, insects, and small mammals. Each thrives in that “mess,” while an artificially neat environment might lack these beneficial microhabitats.

This is also where the text distinguishes between actual order and the human desire for neatness. We often mow lawns into uniform surfaces, removing diverse wild plants. Yes, it might look tidy, but we lose pollinator habitats, reduce beneficial insect populations, and might need chemical herbicides to keep that monoculture in place.

Thus, the text encourages us to let go of certain aesthetic biases. Instead, it champions ecologically functional designs that might look unconventional but foster greater resilience. “Order or chaos” becomes more than just a visual question; it’s about whether we create systems that harness natural successions or stifle them. A permaculture garden might look like a riot of species, but if each plant benefits others—through nitrogen-fixing, shading, pest control—then it’s a beautifully ordered tapestry from an ecological standpoint.

There’s also the concept of “permitted and forced functions.” Some designs try to force a function, like spraying pesticides to kill all insects, ignoring that many insects are vital pollinators. Other designs permit or encourage beneficial functions—like planting flowers to attract pollinators, thus boosting fruit yields. So, we must decide if we want to go for forced, often resource-intensive solutions, or more permissive, synergy-based solutions.

Diversity And Stability

Moving on, the text emphasizes diversity as a cornerstone of stability. Numerous scientific studies echo this: diverse ecosystems bounce back faster from disturbances like storms, droughts, or pest invasions. In design terms, that might mean planting a variety of crops, using multiple livestock species, or building a patchwork of habitats. The more diversity you have, the less likely you’ll face catastrophic failure if one component falters.

But diversity isn’t just about biodiversity in the sense of plants and animals. It’s also about social systems. The text hints that communities with diverse skill sets or decentralized governance often fare better in crises than hyper-centralized ones. This broad principle of multiplicity extends to financial, cultural, and knowledge frameworks, not just ecological ones.

Indeed, it’s a crucial lesson: monocultures—whether they’re farms, ideas, or governance models—tend to be brittle. A single pest or breakdown can unravel everything. By contrast, a diverse orchard might suffer a peach blight but still have plums, cherries, pears, and nuts thriving. That resilience is a form of stability that can’t be matched by single-crop plantations reliant on synthetic inputs. The text advocates for building in that resilience from the start, rather than scrambling to fix problems mid-crisis.

Time And Yield

Here, the text circles back to how yield accumulates over time. It’s not just an instant snapshot. You might establish a food forest with species that bear fruit at different times—some produce after two years, others after five, still others after a decade. While you might not see maximum yield immediately, the long-term production curve can be far more stable and abundant.

We also see a critique of short-term outlooks that plague many modern enterprises. Whether it’s corporate earnings or political cycles, there’s often a push for immediate gains with little regard for longevity. By contrast, the text advocates long-haul thinking—recognizing that well-designed systems pay dividends for generations.

Absolutely. And it’s not just about the farm or orchard—families and communities also benefit from a time-based perspective. If children grow up observing cyclical patterns of planting and harvesting, they learn crucial life skills. Knowledge becomes intergenerational, so yields of tradition, identity, and stewardship also accumulate. That intangible dimension can be a big factor in whether a locale remains vibrant or deteriorates.

Principle Summary

At this stage, the text outlines a summary of guiding principles. We’ve touched on many already, but seeing them together is illuminating:

1. Work with nature, not against it.
2. See problems as solutions in disguise.
3. Make the least change for the greatest effect.
4. Capture energy before it leaves your system.
5. Diversify for resilience.
6. Return what you take.

Those are just paraphrased examples, but they underscore the spirit of a design-based approach.

And each principle can be expanded. “Work with nature” includes harnessing natural successions, natural pest controls, and microclimates, among others. “Problems as solutions” means rethinking so-called liabilities (like slopes or wild animals) as potential resources. By adhering to these principles, we align ourselves with ecological processes instead of forcing them to bend to short-term or simplistic demands.

References And Sources

The text includes references to both older, possibly tribal lore and modern ecological studies, bridging the gap between ancient wisdom and contemporary science. This is important because it reminds us we’re not reinventing the wheel; we’re rediscovering best practices that humans used for millennia, combined with insights from modern research. The references also highlight broader influences—like how the works of James Lovelock (Gaia), Buckminster Fuller (design science), and many others feed into this design approach.

Yes, it’s a tapestry of influences. The synergy of diverse sources is part of what makes the approach robust. It’s not derived from a single doctrine or narrow ideology. Instead, it draws from multiple cultural traditions, scientific disciplines, and direct observations of nature. This gives it the adaptability needed to work in deserts, temperate zones, tropical forests—anywhere life can flourish.

Critique And Analysis—Bringing It All Together

Now that we’ve moved systematically through these sections, we should step back and critique some of the ideas. One potential criticism might be the assumption that everyone can adopt these principles easily. In many parts of the world, there are legal or social barriers—like zoning laws preventing backyard livestock, or financial systems that push quick returns over long-term ecological management. So, while the design approach is sound, the real challenge may be navigating societal constraints.

Another critique is that this approach demands a shift in mindset. If individuals, corporations, or governments persist in short-term thinking or immediate profit, they may resist changing to cyclical, regenerative methods. There’s a tension between the slow-and-steady viewpoint here and the faster, industrial pace in many modern sectors.

True. And we should also consider the question of scale. The text focuses heavily on how to design integrated systems. On a personal or community level, that can be relatively straightforward—like implementing composting, water catchment, or orchard designs. But scaling these principles to mega-cities or entire countries can be daunting, especially where there’s entrenched infrastructure that wasn’t built with cyclical use in mind.

Nevertheless, there’s real value in these critiques because they highlight the need for incremental changes, pilot projects, and perhaps legislative reforms that encourage regenerative practices. We might not transform a large metropolis overnight, but we can start with neighborhoods, then expand. In fact, the text itself encourages “start small and build on success,” which mirrors the approach of many community-led programs around the world.

Additional Insights—An Example Of Application

Before we conclude, let’s consider a practical example to demonstrate how these concepts might look in real life. Imagine a small plot on the outskirts of a city. Typically, that land might be turned into a single-crop field or subdivided for housing. But if we apply these sections’ teachings, we might do something more nuanced:

1. Acknowledge the local natural cycles—sunlight angles, prevailing winds, seasonal rainfall.
2. Bring ethics into the design. Replenish the soil with green manures, compost, minimal tilling.
3. Craft a set of principles rather than rigid rules. Decide we’ll always have at least two or three companion species per bed to ensure biodiversity.
4. Create a water catchment pond at the highest elevation possible. Let water gravity-feed into swales below.
5. Identify resources that might increase with use—like certain hardy shrubs that respond to light pruning.
6. Sketch out yields that include not just produce but also education, community gatherings, or pollinator habitat.
7. Weave in cyclical processes: orchard prunings go to compost, compost feeds vegetables, vegetables feed us, scraps feed chickens, and chickens supply manure.
8. Keep an eye on complex connections, ensure the system remains diverse, and think over a multi-year timeline for yield stability.
9. Summarize the overarching guidelines, referencing local knowledge and proven studies.
10. Critique the design as you go, adapt to real-world constraints, and gather further insights to refine the system.

That’s exactly how these concepts become tangible. You begin with broad ecological awareness, refine it with ethical principles, then incorporate practical design elements that recycle and repurpose resources. Over time, you develop a small demonstration of the text’s principles—a living, ever-evolving demonstration. This is powerful because it doesn’t remain purely theoretical. People can see, smell, and taste the results. That often convinces them more than abstract arguments.

Long-Term Vision And Invitation For Further Thought

In closing, these sections emphasize that a design approach anchored in ecological reality can lead to more than just higher yields. It fosters a sense of responsibility and connection among everyone involved. It reduces reliance on destructive inputs, invites biodiversity, and creates living landscapes that thrive in harmony with human habitation.

At the same time, the text repeatedly acknowledges that the journey requires effort, observation, and willingness to adapt. There’s no one-size-fits-all formula. Each region, each culture, will find its own configurations of these principles. That’s arguably the greatest strength of an adaptable design framework: it doesn’t freeze us into dogmatic constraints; it offers guidance while empowering local creativity.

Absolutely. And that empowerment is crucial. If design remains top-down and rigid, we’ll just replicate old mistakes in new forms. But if people on the ground absorb these ideas, experiment with them, and share results, it becomes a living science—constantly evolving, collectively managed, and deeply ethical. The text’s underlying message is that we all have roles to play in shaping the future, and that large-scale transformation begins with local initiatives.

We’ve now extensively covered these sections, weaving in critique, interpretation, and practical examples. The hope is that anyone listening comes away with fresh insights on how design principles, ecological cycles, and ethical frameworks can align to create robust, self-sustaining systems.

Conclusion

That brings us to the end of our in-depth look at these ideas. We moved through each major theme, reflecting on how ancient taboos, modern thermodynamics, resource classifications, yield strategies, cyclical thinking, and the critical nature of diversity and stability intertwine. Next time, we’ll continue our journey with the following segments, which explore practical methods of design, including how to systematically observe a site, map out possible approaches, and apply the principle of incremental change. We’ll also delve deeper into the concept of successional design, learning how ecosystems evolve and how we can steer that evolution in beneficial ways.

We’ll be exploring how analysis, direct observation, overlay mapping, flow diagrams, zoning, and a range of other techniques come together to shape effective design strategies. We’ll also see how the idea of guilds—cooperative groupings of plants and animals—can be a game-changer for long-term resilience. We look forward to sharing more.

That’s it for now. We hope our reflections on this material have sparked new ways of thinking about design, resource cycles, and ecological ethics. We’ll move forward by examining how these broad concepts translate into on-the-ground methods that anyone can practice or adapt.